|
Municipal Hospitals
in Mumbai
A Brief Overview
January 6, 2006
Meenakshi Verma
Background:
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) is the
largest and wealthiest civic organization in the country, and it covers an area
of 434 sq km. The MCGM runs several different aspects of the city and the
Municipal hospitals are one of them.
Before discussing the Municipal hospitals in Mumbai, it is
important to have an understanding of the basic health information of the city.
Since the most recent report is currently being published, the following
information was gathered from the 2001-2002 report. According to the 2001-2002
Health Profile published by the BMC public health department, these were the
health statistics of the city:
|
Statistics
for Mumbai 2001-2002
|
|
Population
|
12.04 million
|
|
Birth Rate
|
15.5
|
|
Death Rate
|
7.01
|
|
IMR (Infant Mortality Rate) per 1000
|
38.79%
|
|
MMR (Maternal Mortality Rate) per 100,000
|
.12 %
|
It is important to note that accessing data for this kind
of research is often hard to find and as equally as difficult to understand.
This data should be taken as an estimation based on the findings of the MCGM
health profile. However, the reports essentially demonstrate with an expanding
population, over 50% of people living in slums, and lack of access to proper
medical services for many underprivileged communities, Mumbai’s current
services are unable to meet the demand for better health care systems.
Current hospital
services provided by the City of
Mumbai
:
The MCGM has a complex web of services including hospitals,
dispensaries, health posts, and maternity homes. In summary:
§
4 teaching hospitals
§
5 specialized hospitals
§
16 peripheral hospitals
§
28 municipal maternity homes
§
14 maternity wards attached to municipal hospitals
§
17,000+ employees
There are approximately 40,000+ beds in the city, and MCGM
runs between 10,000 and 11,000 of them. According to a report by the Bombay
Community Public Trust, as many as 10 million patients are treated annually in
the Out-Patient Departments (OPDs) in the MCGM hospitals. At King Edward
Memorial (KEM) hospital, there are over 1.2 million people treated annually,
alone. The state government has one medical college, three general hospitals and
two health units with a total of 2,871 beds. There is also one hospital run by
the central government. Each of the peripheral hospitals is linked to one of the
four (tertiary) specialty hospitals. The health posts and the dispensaries are
linked to the peripheral hospitals in their respective Wards. These health posts
were established to provide convenient and easy to access locations for people
seeking treatment for minor ailments that did not require a visit to the
hospital. Conceptually, this complex system is quite possibly one of the most
elaborate ones that exist for a city with a burgeoning population with such
strains on the public health infrastructure. However, several aspects of such a
large bureaucracy also prevent the care from reaching underprivileged
communities in time.
Even within this complex system, which is designed to reach
the city’s residents through preventive, promotive, and curative care ends up
falling short when trying to reach out to the communities that need their care
the most. For example, the K-East ward, which covers Jogeshwari, Vile Parle, and
Andheri is home to over 800,000 people living in low/low-middle class
communities. This entire ward does not have one municipal hospital in its area.
It should be noted that within 11 dispensaries, there are 9 vacancies for
physicians to fill these posts. In a report by Mr. Ravi Duggal of CEHAT “The
Un-Met need for Public Health Services in Mumbai,
India
” , a team surveyed the health care needs of the K-East community in
collaboration with the BMC found that 80-83% of people would access the
municipal services if they were closer in proximity and economical. Many of
people who currently access the public services in the area (dispensaries and
such) often do not have a choice to go to a closer, private hospital and have to
access a public facility at the risk of losing a day’s wages.
Major Challenges:
It is clear that a wider net of bureaucracy seems to be
slowing down the process of sending health care to those who need it the most.
Additionally, the three major reasons cited in the research into utilization of
municipal hospitals are summarized in the following three areas: lack of
infrastructure, access/location, and inconvenient timings. Although the teaching
hospitals and the specialized hospitals are equipped adequately, many consumers
find the peripheral hospitals lacking in infrastructure and ill-equipped to
handle certain serious medical cases. Once those cases are further referred to
the tertiary hospitals- it can be too late. The lack of infrastructure also
includes inadequate staffing of physicians, in a population where the draw of
private practice is often more appealing than to work for a government hospital-
with little resources and a meager salary. This is exemplified by the fact that
the K-east ward currently only has 2 out of 11 doctors positions filled for such
a large population. As highlighted
in the K-East ward in Mumbai, for a population who does not have a disposable
income, they are forced to access private services instead of having close
access to the public ones.
Access/location is a critical aspect of utilizing public
health care facilities. Without access to convenient locations, the population
has to turn elsewhere for services. This in turn becomes a breeding ground for
quacks or unqualified doctors to take advantage of the need of the impoverished,
working communities. Finally, the aspect of inconvenient timings is a critical
one as many of the people accessing public health care facilities and municipal
hospitals are unable to take the kind of time from their service-sector jobs
needed to travel long distances and wait in long queues to access medical
services.
Conclusion &
Discussion:
Although there seem to be many problems associated with the
public healthcare system, it is clear that there is an opportunity for growth.
Through the proper flow of funds and allowing a certain degree of independence
at the hospital level, there can be improvements in the system. If the MCGM puts
a mandate on a “Healthy Mumbai”, then there will be clear benefits for a
city with such a large and dynamic population. In this discussion, there should
be systems designed for better accuracy in reporting, improved patient care, and
quality assurance at the hospital levels. If these systems are integrated, then
we can look forward to a truly “Healthy Mumbai”.
Works cited:
Duggal, Ravi et al, “Unmet needs for Public Health Care
in Mumbai
India
, June 2004.
Qureshi, Athar Dr., “Health Services in Mumbai”, 2002
(unconfirmed)
Personal interviews and data collection
Another fascinating
example of democracy at work is the use of participatory budgeting at the local
level. In Porto Allegro,
Brazil
, citizen participation is preparing municipal budgets that have reallocated
spending, raising the share of households with access to water services from 80%
to 98%, and nearly doubling access to sanitation from 46% to 85% Similar
experiments in gender-responsive budgeting are being pursued in at least 40
countries.
|