![]() |
|
||||||||
| |
|
Home >> Nonprofit
of the month >> Nonprofit of the month selection |
|
This is a brief
note about selection criteria for the 'nonprofit-of-the-month'.
Firstly, it is not an Award i.e.
- it is not a selection of an ngo from
amongst others in that same category.
- so it is not a comment on other ngo's
in the same or other sectors.
- I realise that other ngo's may
be far better.
We are not a formal or statutory
or a 'leader' org that we have to follow some specific procedures or set
criteria. (That's what I think.) So the selection is fairly subjective.
I ran the 7 km part of the marathon
on behalf of S P J Sadhana School and I realised that it is indeed difficult
to raise funds.
At the same time, my belief is that
there are lots and lots of people who would donate small amounts to ngo's
if some neutral third party recommended some ngo's.
I also felt that if I came across a
good ngo, it may be of value to some people to know about such good ngo's.
Moreover, it would take my interaction with an ngo beyond the meeting
to something which could be of potential value to the ngo and other people.
So this led me to wonder what would
be the smallest amount that people can give easily (e.g. when one meets
someone at a party) while making it worthwhile for them, us and the ngo
to incur the admin costs of collection, recording, etc. I thought this
amount could be Rs. 100.
When the number of supporters increase,
the total amount may also become meaningful. Till then, it at least puts
the ngo into contact with some supporters, a few of who could also support
the ngo in more meaningful ways. My feeling is that ngo's (especially
small ones) face the problem of having a large donor base, but also the
problem of a large supporter base.
Accordingly, S P J Sadhana became the
automatic first choice.
Sunbeam was the first ngo that I had
come in contact through a friend. This was a couple of months before I
began Karmayog i.e. when I was trying to figure out how to get involved
with nonprofits. I was impressed with the sincerity and dedication of
Aban and Khurshid and Sunbeam became the second month's choice.
In PAWS, I saw that Nilesh was
very enthusiastic & doing a lot of stuff while holding a full-time
job. When his appeal came that they are very short of funds, PAWS became
the third month's choice.
I have not really thought through the
various criteria but typically I would veer towards small budget NGOs
so that the small collections that the Rs. 100 scheme currently brings
would at least result in some impact.
I must add that I don't do a lot of
due diligence. I see the annual activity report and the audited financial
report and the duly-filled profile form on the Karmayog website, and have
a brief interaction with the people involved. After that, if I feel comfortable
that an individual donor can donate upto Rs. 10,000 without having to
do their own verification, then the ngo passes my criteria.
So donors should do their own due diligence
if they would like to donate large amounts.
Finally, I would like to add that I
operate on the belief that donation is not about the ngo. It is about
oneself.
And I do hope you will support the idea
by sending your Rs. 100 cheque every month to the 'nonprofit-of-the-month'.
I would very much appreciate your views
on all this.
Thanks,
Vinay
|
|